#PhilChat Behind the Scenes

User .Minh Luu
Posted Date : February 13, 2013

By: 

On Thursday, the Council held its fourth monthly Twitter Chat - or #PhilChat - in partnership with the Chronicle of Philanthropy to pose the question: Is Philanthropy Succeeding in Rural America? With more than 30 active participants and 300 tweets, it proved to be one of most successful #PhilChats to date. Not just quantitatively, but in the number of important takeaways for the sector.

Now I write this with one caveat: I am not a policy expert or practitioner of rural philanthropy, but I did attend the Council’s Rural Philanthropy Conference in Kansas City last year. Instead, I approach this from a social media/public relations perspective.

The topic was chosen for several reasons. It  was apparent during last year’s conference that there is a strong need and want for more data, sharing, and resources, and there are a number of challenges both unique to rural communities and the field as a whole. Throughout the #PhilChat, it became even more obvious that this was the case. A comment posted on the Council’s Facebook page summed it up perfectly: “I’d just like to thank you for hosting this. We need more of these where we can exchange links/data.”

As with other #PhilChats, we invited several special guests to participate based on their expertise in the field and/or public policy. This time around, guest tweeters included Chris Beck of the U.S. Department of Agriculture; the Center for Rural Entrepreneurship’s Ahmet Binerer; Tim Marema of The Daily Yonder; West Virginia Grantmakers’ Paul Daugherty; and Linda Reed of Montana Community Foundation, who all offered valuable input based on their knowledge and experience in the area.

Woven throughout the 300-plus tweets were several common threads that are quite telling about the state of rural philanthropy:

  • More needs to be done to keep young people in rural areas and engage them in philanthropy.
  • The lack of infrastructure in rural areas is both a barrier for philanthropy and an opportunity to make a difference.
  • There have been many examples of successful public-philanthropic partnerships, but more are needed.
  • Specific geographic issues make it difficult for rural funders to unite behind single causes.
  • The different and strict definitions of “rural” act as a barrier.

Based on the #PhilChat, if I now had to answer the initial question “is philanthropy succeeding in rural America?” I would have to give it an incomplete grade. Many challenges need to be hurdled, but there is a dedicated field who are ensuring philanthropy delivers to rural communities, and there are enough examples of success to show that there is promise.

Am I wrong? How would you answer the question? And what does the sector need for successful rural philanthropy?

Have an idea for a future #PhilChat? Please email me with your suggestions.

Mark Carpenter is manager, public relations at the Council on Foundations.

Add new comment

raw HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.