Current as of August 2015 | Download print version  (in PDF)
Comments related to any information in this Note should be addressed to India Adams .
Table of Contents
- Applicable Laws and Regulations
- Relevant Legal Forms
- Specific Questions Regarding Local Law
- Tax Laws
- Knowledgeable Contacts
The People's Republic of China (PRC) is a civil law country  with three legal forms of "social organizations," which is the official Chinese term for nongovernmental, not-for-profit organizations (NPOs):
- Social Associations (SAs) (社会团体，shehui tuanti), which are the equivalent of membership associations; 
- Civil Non-enterprise Institutions (CNIs) (民办非企业单位，minban fei qiye danwei) which are similar to service providers; and
- Foundations (基金会，jijinhui).
In addition to these legal forms, there are many informal NPOs registered as for-profit businesses as well as unregistered NPOs.  Some unregistered NPOs gain legal status by attaching themselves to another legal entity, such as a social organization or a “public institution,” including universities and research institutes. NPOs registered as businesses and unregistered NPOs are technically not NPOs in a legal sense, but they are voluntary, nongovernmental, not-for-profit, self-governing organizations in an operational sense. They are mission-driven, not-for-profit organizations founded by and governed by private individuals. Many are funded by foreign governments and embassies, international organizations and foundations, and are required to justify the not-for-profit nature of their activities in their reports to funders.
Together, these three legal forms of NPOs and the informal NPOs are the closest equivalent to nongovernmental, not-for-profit organizations. A substantial portion of the legal NPOs – in particular, SAs and foundations – were either created by the government or have close ties with a particular government agency, and are often referred to as government-organized NGOs (GONGOs). In contrast, the informal NPOs generally are more independent.
A fourth type of organization, the public institution or public service unit (事业单位，shiye danwei), is a quasi-governmental agency, generally formed by the government and staffed with government employees. Public universities, research institutes, and hospitals fall in this category. They are discussed in this Note because they frequently receive grants from foreign donors and are subject to some of the same tax rules as NPOs. There is also a plan to carry out a reform of public institutions  by privatizing a portion of them and turning them into social organizations.
Note on Terminology:
In addition to the term "social organization," Ministry of Civil Affairs authorities who oversee NPOs sometimes use the term minjian zuzhi (民建组织), which literally means "popular" organizations, or "citizen-initiated" organizations. There is no good English-language equivalent for this term but it is often used synonymously with civil society organization (公民社会组织 gongminshehui zuzhi; nongovernmental organization, 非政府组织， feizhengfu zhuzhi; or not-for-profit organization, 非盈利组织， feiyingli zuzhi). This "minjian zuzhi" category covers SAs, CNIs, and foundations, but not public institutions. The agency within the Ministry of Civil Affairs charged with supervising and registering these organizations – the NPO Management Bureau (民间组织管理局 minjian zuzhi guanli ju) – also uses the same term.
The term “social organization,” in its broadest and unofficial sense, is also sometimes used to refer to trade unions, religious organizations, and other “people’s organizations” (人民团体，renmin tuanti), which have been created by the Communist Party of China as links to specific social constituencies. Examples include the All China Federation of Trade Unions, Communist Youth League, All China Women’s Federation, China Science and Technology Association, All China Youth Federation, and All China Federation of Industry and Commerce. These people’s organizations enjoy a special status; they are governed by separate laws and are beyond the scope of this Note, but they often present themselves to the outside world as NGOs.  Similarly, certain not-for-profit organizations such as the Chinese Red Cross enjoy special status and are governed by their own laws. In addition, specific rules governing various kinds of not-for-profit organizations may apply in certain provinces and cities. These rules may be, but are not always, available in Chinese on the websites of the local Civil Affairs authorities or the website  of the Ministry of Civil Affairs based in Beijing. This Note focuses primarily on national legislation.
This Note addresses legislation enacted and in force in China as of August 2015. However, legislation governing Chinese NPOs is continuously under review and revision, so local experts should be consulted if more information is sought on recent changes. The key legal instruments under review include: Regulations on the Registration and Administration of Social Associations (1998); Interim Regulations on the Registration and Administration of Civil Non-enterprise Institutions (1998); Regulations on the Management of Foundations (2004); and other documents. Following the Third Plenum of the 18th Central Committee in November of 2013, it was announced that the revised regulations for SAs would be ready sometime in 2014, followed by revised regulations for CNIs and foundations at a later date.  In addition, a draft law governing charitable activities and a draft law regulating overseas NGOs are both under discussion. 
Income Tax: In theory, donations, state subsidies, and some other forms of income are tax exempt. According to the Public Welfare Donations Law, contributions to legal NPOs are theoretically deductible from income tax, with limits depending on the type of taxpayer, the type of beneficiary, and the use of the contribution (see Section V.B below). In practice, however, NPOs that are legally registered with Civil Affairs must still apply separately to the tax bureau in order to obtain tax benefits. Furthermore, there is little familiarity with income tax deductibility for donations among both tax authorities and donors, a problem that is compounded by the absence of a comprehensive and coherent tax system tailored specifically to NPOs. Contributions to informal NPOs, moreover, are not tax deductible.
Indirect Taxes: In theory, NPOs that engage in nursing, medical, educational, cultural, or religious activities or activities in which services are performed by the disabled are exempted from the Business Tax on the sale of services. In practice, they often need to register separately for tax benefits. Moreover, informal NPOs that are registered as businesses are required to pay the Business Tax.
The PRC also subjects most goods and services to VAT and imposes customs duties on imports. Certain goods are exempt from VAT and customs duties, including goods donated by international organizations as well as goods donated by persons outside China to specified national-level social organizations.
- Constitution of the People's Republic of China (1982, as revised), esp. Article 35 
- Provisional Measures on Management of Foreign Chambers of Commerce in China (July 1, 1989)
- Law of the Red Cross Society of the People's Republic of China (adopted by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, October 31, 1993)
- Regulations on the Registration and Administration of Social Associations (issued by the State Council, October 25, 1998) 
- Interim Regulations on the Registration and Administration of Civil Non-enterprise Institutions (issued by the State Council, October 25, 1998) 
- Interim Regulations on the Registration and Administration of Public Institutions (issued by the State Council, October 25, 1998) 
- Public Welfare Donations Law (adopted by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, June 28, 1999) 
- Provisional Measures on Banning Illegal NGOs (issued by the Ministry of Civil Affairs, April 10, 2000
- Trust Law of People's Republic of China (adopted by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, April 28, 2001) 
- Non-State Education Promotion Law of the People's Republic of China (adopted by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, December 28, 2002)
- Regulations on the Management of Foundations (issued by the State Council, March 8, 2004) 
- Provisions on the Administration of Names of Foundations (issued by the Ministry of Civil Affairs, June 23, 2004)
- Accounting System for Civil Not-for-Profit Organizations (issued by the Ministry of Finance, August 18, 2004) 
- Measures of Annual Inspection of Private Non-enterprise Entities (issued by the Ministry of Civil Affairs, April 7, 2005) 
- Measures for the Information Disclosure of Foundations (issued by the Ministry of Civil Affairs, January 12, 2006)
- Measures for the Annual Inspection of Foundations (issued by the Ministry of Civil Affairs, January 12, 2006) 
- Law of the People's Republic of China on Individual Income Tax (1980, as amended), Art. 6; and Detailed Rules for the Implementation of the Individual Income Tax Law of the People's Republic of China (revised in 2005), Art. 24 
- Provisional Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Enterprise Income Tax (1993), Art. 6, and Detailed Rules for the Implementation of the Provisional Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Enterprise Income Tax (1994), Art. 12 
- Notice of the Ministry of Finance and the State Administration of Taxation on the Policies and Relevant Management Issues Concerning the Pre-tax Deduction of Public Welfare Relief Donations (January 18, 2007)
- Enterprise Income Tax Law of the People's Republic of China, Arts. 9, 26 (promulgated by the National People's Congress March 16, 2007, effective January 1, 2008)
- Regulation on the Implementation of the Enterprise Income Tax Law of the People's Republic of China (issued by the State Council, 2007), Arts. 51, 52, 53, 84, 85
- Measures for the Administration of Donations for Disaster Relief (issued by the Ministry of Civil Affairs, April 28, 2008)
- Select Opinions of the General Office of the State Council on Accelerating and Promoting the Reform and Development of Trade Associations and Chambers of Commerce (September 24, 2007)
- Notice of the General Office of the Ministry of Health on the Provisions on the Administration of the Representative Agencies of Overseas Foundations whose Businesses are under the Charge of the Ministry of Health (March 27, 2008)
- Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Issues Concerning the Administration of Foreign Exchange Donated to or by Domestic Institutions (No. 63 ) [English ] [Chinese ] 
Four legal forms of NPOs in China are relevant to foreign grantmakers: the Social Association (SA) (shehui tuanti); the Civil Non-enterprise Institution (CNI) (minban fei qiye danwei); the foundation (jijinhui); and the quasi-governmental public institution (shiye danwei).
Social Associations (SAs): SAs constitute the earliest form of legal NPOs in the PRC and are essentially membership associations of various kinds. Many industry and professional associations fall into this category. They are formed to advance “the common desires of their members,” and may be formed for mutual benefit or public benefit (Regulations on the Registration and Administration of Social Associations).
SAs are subject to joint oversight by (1) their registration and administration agency (generally the Ministry of Civil Affairs in Beijing or a provincial, municipal, or local civil affairs bureau or office); and (2) a professional agency responsible for the organization (generally a government ministry or other state agency at the national, provincial, municipal, or local level with jurisdiction over the SA's sphere of activity). As with all NPOs, the Civil Affairs bureaucracy carries out a “multi-level management system” (分级管理，fenji guanli) in which SAs with nationwide activities or impact are regulated at the national level, while SAs with regional or local activities or impact are regulated at the provincial, city, or county level.
The requirements for registering as a SA, particularly a national-level SA, are set quite high and it is difficult to obtain SA status without some kind of government support. As a result, many SAs have some sort of government background and are perceived as GONGOs, rather than independent NPOs.
Civil Non-enterprise Institutions (CNIs): CNIs are "social institutions established by enterprises, institutions, social organizations, or other social forces as well as individual citizens using non-state assets and conducting non-profit-making social service activities” (Interim Regulations on the Registration and Administration of Civil Non-enterprise Institutions).
Private schools, private not-for-profit research institutes, and private not-for-profit hospitals are often registered as CNIs. CNIs, like SAs and foundations, are subject to the joint oversight of a registration and administration agency (generally Ministry of Civil Affairs or provincial or local civil affairs authority) and a professional agency such as a government ministry or agency at the provincial or local level.
It is generally easier to register as a CNI than an SA, and more independent NPOs have been able to register as CNIs, especially at the local level. In recent years, more informal NPOs registered as businesses have been able to register as CNIs.
Foundations: A foundation is a not-for-profit organization that promotes public benefit undertakings through grants and donations. Its assets are donated by individuals, legal persons, or other organizations (Regulations on the Administration of Foundations (RAF) Article 2).
Foundations, like SAs and CNIs, are regulated by both a registration and administration agency, usually the Ministry of Civil Affairs in Beijing or a provincial, municipal, or local Civil Affairs bureau or office, and by a professional agency such as the relevant government ministry or agency at the national, provincial, municipal, or local level. In laws and regulations issued prior to the 2004 Foundation Regulations (such as the Public Welfare Donations Law), the term "social organization" included foundations. 
The 2004 Regulations on the Administration of Foundations distinguish between foundations that engage in public fundraising (hereafter “public foundations”) (公墓基金会，gongmu jijinhui) and those that engage in non-public fundraising (hereafter “private foundations”) (非公墓基金会，feigongmu jijinhui). The most significant distinction between public and private foundations is that the former is allowed to engage in public fundraising whereas the latter is not. Private foundations are generally funded by a major gift from a corporation or family. In recent years, with the rapid increase of wealthy entrepreneurs and the emergence of tax laws encouraging individual and corporate giving, private foundations have grown very quickly and currently rival their public foundation counterparts in numbers. In 2004, there were no private foundations. In 2011, the number of private foundations exceeded 1,000 – roughly equal to the number of public foundations.
Generally speaking, public foundation status is difficult to obtain; most public foundations are in fact GONGOs. These include some of China’s best-known foundations, such as the China Youth Development Foundation, the Soong Ching Ling Foundation, and the China Foundation for Poverty Alleviation. Only a few independent foundations are registered as public foundations. In 2010, Jet Li’s One Foundation made news by becoming one of the few private foundations to get public foundation status. The Nanjing-based Amity Foundation is another example of a relatively independent public foundation.
Public Institutions:Public institutions are “social service organizations sponsored by state organs or other organizations using state-owned assets that engage in educational, science and technological, cultural, medical, and other activities for the purpose of social benefit” (Interim Regulations on the Registration and Administration of Public Institutions Article 2). Thus, these organizations are commonly more closely linked to the state than other types of NPOs. Public schools and universities, scientific research institutes, and public social care institutions are generally public institutions.  On April 16, 2012, the State Council publicized "Guidelines on Advancing Public Institution Reform By Categories," regarding the government's ambitious plans to convert around 80% of existing Public Institutions into social organizations over the next five years as part of a broader effort to streamline government administration.
Chinese law distinguishes between NPOs that have a public benefit purpose and those that serve other purposes. The Public Welfare Donations Law confers public benefit status on two categories of organizations: “public welfare social organizations” and “public welfare nonprofit public institutions.” In theory, NPOs with public benefit status are eligible for tax deduction or exemption (Public Welfare Donations Law Chapter 4). However, the reality is quite different, as China lacks a comprehensive, coherent and detailed set of tax regulations for NPOs. As a result, tax bureaus and NPOs themselves are often not familiar with the preferential tax provisions, and receiving tax deductions or exemptions requires that both the NPO and the individual or enterprise making the donation undertake additional procedures. NPOs with public benefit status are also subject to stricter government supervision (Public Welfare Donations Law Chapters 3-5). 
According to Article 10 of the Public Welfare Donations Law, "public benefit social organizations" are legally established foundations, charitable organizations, and other social organizations founded to promote public benefit undertakings. Article 3 provides that the following activities qualify as "public benefit undertakings:" 
- Disaster relief, poverty alleviation, assistance to the handicapped, and assistance to social organizations in needy circumstances;
- Education, scientific, cultural, public health, and athletic undertakings;
- Environmental protection and construction of public facilities; and
- Other public benefit undertakings promoting social development and progress.
“Public benefit nonprofit institutions” are legally established educational institutions, scientific research institutions, health institutions, cultural institutions, public sports institutions, social welfare institutions and others that carry out public benefit undertakings and are not-for-profit.
All foundations, some SAs, and most public institutions have public benefit status. In theory, CNIs can also obtain public benefit status and accept donations under the Public Welfare Donations Law. Informal NPOs registered as businesses or that are unregistered, however, are not eligible for tax exemption, even though operationally they are nonprofit and have a public benefit purpose. Some of China’s best-known independent public benefit NPOs fall into this category.
Chinese law generally prohibits inurement for all NPOs except private schools, which are regulated by the Law to Promote Private Education (see below).
The law prohibits any action to “usurp, divide in secret or misappropriate the assets” of an SA (Regulations on the Registration and Administration of Social Associations Article 29). All of an SA’s income must be devoted to the activities addressed in the association’s governing statute or constitution, and may not be divided among members. All donations and subsidies must be used in conformity with the association’s purposes and the agreements made with donors. In addition, employees' compensation must be set with reference to the salaries set for employees of the supervising governmental agency or other unit, which means they generally mirror the salaries of civil servants.
With regard to foundations and CNIs, the relevant provisions are nearly identical to those governing SAs (Regulations on the Management of Foundations Article 27; Interim Regulations on the Registration and Administration of Civil Non-enterprise Institutions Article 21). A 2005 Ministry of Civil Affairs notice on CNIs’ accountability and self-governance further requires that all CNIs comply with the Accounting System for Civil NPOs issued in August 2004, thereby securing additional protection against inurement in the case of CNIs.
For public institutions, all the institution’s income must be devoted to activities that advance its purposes (Interim Regulations on the Registration and Administration of Public Institutions Article 15). The public institution must use all donations and subsidies in conformity with the purposes of the organization and the agreements with donors.
The Public Welfare Donations Law sets forth similar provisions regarding inurement (Public Welfare Donations Law Articles 17, 18, and 23).
There is one exception to the general rule against inurement: The founders of a private school are permitted to receive a "reasonable return" on their investment (Law to Promote Private Education Article 51).
The legal framework contains general prohibitions but no detailed rules governing financial transactions or “self-dealing” between NPOs and their founders, donors, directors, officers, employees, or family members.
The Accounting System for Civil NPOs (effective January 2005) specifically states that “resource providers do not have ownership of [NPOs]” (Article 2(3)). Though the law and regulations do not explicitly prohibit a donor from making a conditional donation, various regulations limit how an NPO can use its property and income, which may imply that donors cannot revoke their contributions.
The Public Welfare Donations Law provides that if the recipient changes the nature and use of the donated property without the consent of the donor, and refuses to abide by a competent authority’s order to cure the violation of the donor’s instructions, the authorities can transfer the property to another NPO with the same or similar purposes, after consulting the donor (Article 28).
The regulations do not address whether members of a mutual benefit SA can receive their contributions back when they cease being members.
The founders of a private school may retain a proprietary interest in the property they contribute to a school. During the existence of the school, however, they are entitled to claim only a “reasonable return,” and they cannot revoke their contribution or receive their property back (Law to Promote Private Education Article 36). It is not yet clear whether they can recover their property upon dissolution of the private school.
Chinese law is largely silent on what happens to the assets of an NPO upon its dissolution. One reason for this is the close link between the state and many NPOs. The state has formed virtually all public institutions and most SAs and foundations that exist today. In practice, the assets of a dissolved NPO generally are transferred to another NPO or to the state.
For SAs, the Regulations on the Registration and Administration of Social Associations provide that “[t]he remaining assets of a canceled social association shall be disposed of in accordance with the relevant provisions of the State” (Article 25). The relevant governmental agencies have opined that the assets should not be returned to members or donors.  Further, the Standard Form of Statutes of Social Associations, issued by the Ministry of Civil Affairs, provides that remaining assets should be used to support undertakings similar to those of the dissolved organization, under the supervision of the relevant government authorities (Standard Form of Statutes of Social Associations Article 25).
The Interim Regulations on the Registration and Administration of Civil Non-enterprise Institutions are silent in this regard, but officials generally treat CNIs in the same manner as SAs. 
For foundations, the Regulations on the Administration of Foundations provide that “[t]he remaining assets of a canceled foundation shall be used for public benefit purpose designated in its constitution. When it is not feasible to do so, the registration and administration agency will arrange for the assets to be donated to public benefit organizations whose nature and purpose are similar to the one in question" (Article 33).
Because public institutions are established with state-owned assets, the state typically acquires remaining assets upon dissolution, even in the absence of explicit provisions for their return.
Private schools may be an exception. The Law to Promote Private Education provides that the remaining assets will be disposed of according to related laws or regulations, which have not been issued yet (Article 59). It is possible that the rules will allow founders to recover the property they contributed, but only to the extent of its original value.
An NPO must limit its activities to those set forth in its constitution or statutes (Regulations on the Registration and Administration of Social Associations Articles 29 and 33; Interim Regulations on the Registration and Administration of Civil Non-enterprise Institutions Articles 21 and 25; Regulations on the Administration of Foundations Articles 27 and 42).
Different types of NPOs are able to qualify as legal persons, provided that they follow the appropriate registration procedures. As such, all NPOs have the power to engage in activities of legal persons, except to the extent that the law provides otherwise.
2. Economic Activities
Conducting commercial activities cannot be the principal purpose of an NPO. The law does not distinguish between "related" and "unrelated" commercial activities.
As interpreted by the State Administration of Industry and Commerce (the authority responsible for commercial activities), SAs, CNIs, foundations, and public institutions cannot themselves engage in for-profit businesses, but they can invest in commercial entities unless the State Council provides otherwise. 
An NPO's commercial activities are taxed on the same basis (25%) as a commercial corporation unless the law stipulates otherwise. Exceptions to this rule are rare. Enterprises owned solely by public schools, for example, are exempted from a substantial part of the business tax and VAT. The income of scientific research institutes and higher educational institutions, if derived from the transfer of technology, is exempted from business tax. 
3. Political Activities
No formal legal rules restrict NPO involvement in the legislative process. Organizations commonly debate legislative proposals through the mass media and communicate their opinions to the National People's Congress (NPC) and the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) (an advisory body that meets at the same time as the NPC), as well as to provincial and municipal legislatures.
Though no explicit rules exist, NPOs are generally forbidden to engage in political activity surrounding an election, except for trade unions and certain affiliated organizations of the Chinese Communist Party.
The Constitution of the People's Republic of China guarantees that all “Citizens of the People’s Republic of China have the duty as well as the right to receive education” (Constitution Article 46). Article 4 of the Constitution also guarantees, in formal terms, the equality of all national and ethnic groups in China, and prohibits any form of discrimination against minorities (Constitution Article 4). 
It is possible for a Chinese NPO to be controlled by a for-profit entity. For-profit organizations commonly form or join social organizations, such as chambers of commerce, trade associations, or industry associations. In formal terms, members control a social organization through the members’ assembly, though in practice members' authority may not be substantial.
Many CNIs and private foundations have been established by for-profit organizations. Founders of a CNI or a foundation are permitted to control it throughout its existence. Although it is not explicitly provided in the regulations, control may be established by the statute of a civil non-enterprise institution or a foundation. In practice, a public institution is wholly controlled by its founding organization, which is ordinarily a government agency.
In theory, a Chinese NPO could be controlled by a foreign charitable organization, which would have to be disclosed in the affidavit accompanying its establishment. According to the Regulations for the Administration of Foundations (2004), foreign individuals and organizations may establish representative offices in China, and foreigners are eligible for the positions of president and officers of foundations as long as they reside in China no fewer than three months a year.  Generally the only form of social organization that foreigners can legally join is a foreign chamber of commerce, such as the American Chamber of Commerce-People's Republic of China (AmCham China) and the British Chamber of Commerce in China.  Thediscussions about new regulations for social organizations indicate that foreigners may be permitted to join and perhaps to found certain kinds of social organizations.
The Measures for the Annual Inspection of Foundations issued by the Ministry of Civil Affairs in 2005 require that foundations and representative offices of overseas foundations provide their annual work report for the previous year to the relevant registration and administration organ for review. An annual work report must include: financial statements, auditing reports, and information on donations, acceptance of donations, and offers of funding, as well as any changes in staffing or institution. The Regulations on the Registration and Management of Social Associations and Interim Regulations on the Registration and Administration of Civil Non-Enterprise Institutions  spell out similar requirements for SAs and CNIs.
The Measures for the Information Disclosure of Foundations issued by the Ministry of Civil Affairs in 2006 require foundations or representative offices of overseas foundations to disclose internal information and business undertakings to the general public. The following information must be made generally available: (1) the annual work report of a foundation or representative office of an overseas foundation; (2) information on donation activities by the foundation; and (3) information on the welfare funding projects undertaken by the foundation.
China has three categories of income tax: Enterprise Income Tax, Foreign Invested Enterprise and Foreign Enterprise Income Tax, and Individual Income Tax.
Under the Public Welfare Donations Law, the “state encourages the development of public benefit undertakings, and grants support and preferential treatment to public benefit social organizations and public benefit nonprofit institutions.” This law establishes benefits relating to Enterprise Income Tax (Article 24), Individual Income Tax (Article 25), and Import Duties and VAT (Article 26), but the specifics of the exemptions are set forth in other laws and regulations.
In January 2008, the revised Enterprise Income Tax of the People's Republic of China came into effect. Originally, the Enterprise Income Tax applied to all enterprises, whether or not they had legal personality, as well as to “all other organizations” with income (Interim Regulations on Enterprise Income Tax Article 2). This was interpreted to include NPOs. Under Article 26 of the new amendments, legal not-for-profit organizations are exempt from income tax provided that they meet relevant provisions. Specifically, the income of "qualified not-for-profit organizations" is exempt from Enterprise Income Tax.
According to the Regulations on the Implementation of the Enterprise Income Tax Law of the People's Republic of China, the term "qualified not-for-profit organizations" refers to an organization that concurrently meets the following conditions:
- It has completed registration for not-for-profit organizations according to law;
- It engages in public interest activities or not-for-profit activities;
- Income obtained is used entirely for the public interest or not-for-profit undertakings as registered, approved, or stipulated in the charter, with the exception of reasonable expenses related to the organization;
- Properties and the benefits thereof are not to be distributed;
- Pursuant to the registration, approval, or stipulations of its charter, the surplus properties of the organization after write-off shall be used for public interest or not-for-profit purposes or shall be donated via the administrative agency responsible for registration (usually the Ministry of Civil Affairs or local civil affairs bureau) to another organization of the same nature and with the same tenets, and shall be publicized to the general public;
- No sponsor shall reserve or enjoy any property rights to the properties the sponsor gave to the organization in question; and
- Expenses for the salaries and fringe benefits of staff members are controlled within prescribed limits, and none of the organization's properties shall be distributed in any disguised manner.
The measures for determining whether an NPO meets the required criteria are to be formulated by the competent departments of the State Council responsible for finance and taxation, in collaboration with the other relevant ministries and agencies of the State Council.
The term "qualified income of the not-for-profit organization" does not include income of the not-for-profit organization arising from profit-making activities unless it is set forth by the relevant department of finance or taxation of the State Council.
Although in theory all of an NPO's income is subject to Enterprise Income Tax, a 1997 Ministry of Finance and State Administration of Taxation circular provides a broad exemption for NPOs (Circular Concerning Related Issues of Collection of Enterprise Income Tax to Public Institutions and Social Organizations). To implement this circular, the State Administration of Taxation adopted the Methods of Administration on the Collection of Enterprise Income Tax to Public Institutions, SAs, and CNIs. According to these two documents, an NPO's donations, financial support from the government, membership dues, and some other income are all exempt from Enterprise Income Tax.
It should be noted, however, that the reality is quite different from what is stated in these regulations. Interviews with Chinese NPOs reveal that they need to apply separately for income tax exemptions from the relevant tax offices, many of which are unfamiliar with NPOs and the tax regulations governing them. As a result, income tax exemptions for Chinese NPOs appear to be more the exception than the rule. In addition, there is the usual caveat that informal NPOs are ineligible for these tax exemptions.
Recent changes in tax legislation have increased the portion of taxable income that individuals and enterprises can deduct for public benefit donations to qualifying NPOs. Payers of Individual Income Tax can now deduct up to 30% of their taxable income for public benefit contributions to legal NPOs (Regulations for the Implementation of the Individual Income Tax Law Article 24). Payers of the Enterprise Income Tax can deduct up to 12% of their taxable income (Enterprise Income Tax Law Article 53). The Enterprise Income Tax Law has replaced the Regulations for the Implementation of the Foreign Invested Enterprise and Foreign Enterprise Income Tax.
According to the Regulations on the Implementation of the Enterprise Income Tax Law of the People's Republic of China, the term "public interest donations" as used in Article 51 of the Enterprise Income Tax Law refers to donations made by an enterprise to "public interest social organizations" or the people's government at the county level or above, and its departments, for public interest undertakings as prescribed in the Public Welfare Donations Law.
The term "public interest social organizations" includes any foundation or charitable organization that meets the following conditions:
- It is lawfully registered and has the status of a legal person;
- It serves the purpose of promoting public interest and does not adopt profit-making as its purpose;
- All of its assets and profits belong to the legal person;
- Its proceeds and operational surplus are used primarily for the cause for which the legal person was established;
- The surplus property after the termination of the enterprise is not distributed to any individual or profit-making organization;
- The organization refrains from engaging in any business that does not relate to its purpose of establishment;
- It has a sound financial and accounting system;
- The donor does not participate in the distribution of the property of the social body in any way; and
- Other conditions as prescribed by the departments of Finance and Taxation of the State Council in collaboration with the Civil Affairs departments of the State Council in charge of managing the registration of social organizations.
The more favorable regulations regarding tax deductibility of public benefit donations have had mixed results. Enterprises have taken advantage of these incentives to establish private foundations. The increase in the percentage of enterprise income eligible for tax deductibility from 3% to 12% in 2008 was one main factor behind the rapid growth of private foundations. Individuals, however, have not been as quick to take advantage of the tax laws due to poor implementation of the laws regarding deductibility on individual income taxes and a cultural perception that individuals should not benefit financially from public benefit donations.
As a result, in China, the large majority (about 60%) of donations to public benefit causes come from corporations.  The fact that individual giving makes up a small part of total giving in China is in part a reflection of the lack of clear, simple, and well-publicized tax exemption regulations and procedures for individual donors.
It should also be noted that while in theory there are significant tax incentives in the various income tax laws, the process of applying for a tax benefit is unclear and inconsistent. Only a small number of NPOs have applied and been approved to provide receipts to donors for tax exemption purposes. Moreover, tax offices and individual donors often are not aware of the tax exemption laws or are unsure about how to apply them. In addition, these tax incentives can only be enjoyed by legally registered NPOs, not informal NPOs. Informal NPOs, such as those registered as businesses, do not enjoy these incentives and must pay an additional business tax on their income.
China subjects certain sales of goods and services to Business Tax (which relates to provision of services) and VAT (which relates to sales of goods), and offers few exemptions.
The general Business Tax law exempts NPOs and other entities that engage in nursing, medical, educational, cultural, or religious activities, or activities in which services are performed by the disabled (Interim Regulations on the Business Tax Article 6).
Goods sold within China or goods imported from abroad are subject to VAT. The Interim Regulations on the Value Added Tax exempts from VAT goods for scientific research, experimentation, and education; antique books; and goods imported by organizations of the disabled to be used specifically for the disabled. Imported goods donated by foreign governments and international organizations are also exempt from the VAT under Article 16.
Goods donated by foreign governments and international organizations are also exempt from customs duties (Customs Law Article 56), though an application may need to be submitted in order to avail organizations of that exemption.
Certain other donations are also exempt from customs duties and VAT (Public Welfare Donations Law Article 26). In 2001, the Ministry of Finance, the State Administration of Taxation, and the Customs General Administration jointly issued the Interim Methods of Customs Duties Exemption of Donated Goods for the Purposes of Poverty Relief or Charity. This exemption applies to goods donated by people outside China that are accepted by the government or by “Social Organizations established with the permission of competent departments of the State Council, whose purposes are humanitarian, poverty relief or charity” (Public Welfare Donations Law Article 5). The Customs General Administration enacted implementing rules, under which the exemption applies only to several national-level social organizations, including the Red Cross Society of China, the All-China Women’s Federation, the China Disabled People’s Federation, the China Charity Federation, the China Primary Health Care Foundation, and the Soong Ching Ling Foundation. Most NPOs are excluded.  
According to other rules made by the Customs General Administration, goods are exempted from Customs Duties and VAT if (1) they are imported by scientific research institutes or schools, (2) they are directly for scientific research or education, and (3) they cannot be produced in China.
Certain customs duties or taxes may also be exempted by special rules adopted after significant disasters, such as the 2008 earthquake in Sichuan Province.
NPOs also qualify for exemptions from other taxes, including Real Estate Tax, Urban Land Use Tax, and Tax on Acquisition of Real Estate.
China and the United States have entered into a double-taxation treaty, but it does not specifically address the deductibility of contributions by U.S. residents and businesses to NPOs.
There are few clear rules about the status of foreign NPOs in China. Their status is generally subject to case-by-case scrutiny and discretion by the Ministry of Civil Affairs and other competent authorities, such as the ministries governing professional work in specialized fields (e.g. Ministry of Health and Ministry of Education). The Provisional Measures on Management of Foreign Chambers of Commerce in China (1989) govern the establishment and operations of foreign chambers of commerce in China, and the Regulations for the Management of Foundations (2004) govern the establishment and operations of representative bodies of foreign foundations and NPOs.
According to the Regulations for the Management of Foundations, a foreign foundation or NPO  seeking to establish a representative office in China should provide the following documentation to the registration authority: a letter of application; proof of legal registration in its home country and a copy of its charter; proof of the identities and curricula vitae of the persons who will act as responsible persons in the representative body; proof of place of business; and a document attesting to the decision of the “professional supervising unit” (generally a government agency in the same sector as the foundation) in China to permit it to establish a representative body in China.
Unlike foreign chambers of commerce, which have generally been able to register in China, foreign foundations and NPOs have had more difficulty registering under the Regulations for the Management of Foundations. This is primarily because they are unable to find professional supervising units willing to sponsor them. As of 2014, approximately 30 foreign foundations and NPOs, out of the estimated thousand or more working in China, had successfully registered a representative office. The remainder are either registered as businesses or are unregistered. 
Representative offices of foreign foundations should engage in public benefit activities that are appropriate for the nature of public benefit enterprises in China. These offices, though registered in China, do not have the status of legal persons. Foreign foundations assume civil legal liability for the actions of their representative offices in China in accordance with Chinese law.
Representative offices of foreign foundations may not engage in fundraising or accept donations within China. They are required to submit an annual work report to the organ in charge of registration of foundations and submit to an annual inspection. The annual report should be reviewed and approved by the foundation’s relevant professional government or agency prior to submission. The annual work report should include: a financial report; an audit report by a certified accountant; reports on fundraising activities, donations received and grants made; and information on staffing and organizational changes.
The informal status of the vast majority of foreign foundations and NPOs in China has led the Chinese government at the national and local levels to consider measures that would facilitate registration and thereby bring foreign NPOs under the purview of the Civil Affairs bureaucracy. Pilot programs have taken place in localities such as Yunnan, for instance, to govern foreign foundations and NPOs at the provincial level.  More comprehensive, national regulations for overseas NGOs have also been increasingly under discussion in recent years, and a draft Overseas NGO Law was issued in 2015. 
There have likewise been increased efforts to regulate foreign funding coming into China. Foreign exchange in general is under relatively tight government control in the People’s Republic of China. (For instance, foreign currency donated from abroad is to be exchanged for RMB at a bank specified by Chinese law (Regulations on Foreign Exchange Article 10; Rules of Administration of Purchase, Sale and Payment of Foreign Exchange Article 9).)In 2010, new rules were released by the State Administration of Foreign Exchange governing the administration of foreign funds donated to or by domestic institutions (Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Issues Concerning the Administration of Foreign Exchange Donated to or by Domestic Institutions (“Notice”), No. 63 (2009)). The Notice requires that foreign donations not contravene social morality, or harm the public interest or the lawful rights and interests of citizens (Notice Article 2). It also requires that donated foreign exchanges be transacted through identifiable bank accounts for donated foreign exchange (Notice Article 3).
With respect to funds donated from abroad by foreign nonprofits, domestic "enterprises" (as the Notice labels them, though the term may apply to non-enterprise social organizations and other NPOs, whether registered or unregistered) receiving such funds must file documentation with permitted banks, including: an application; a copy of the domestic institution's business license; a notarized donation agreement with the purpose of the donation described (though the Notice does not make clear whether the notarization is required to take place in China or may take place abroad); a registration certificate for the overseas organization; and other materials that may be required (Notice Article 5).
Social organizations that are not required to register or have had their registration requirement waived may be subject to lesser requirements, involving an application but perhaps not the other documents required of enterprises (Notice Article 6 and Appendix 2).  Other Chinese institutions receiving funds are subject to most of the more detailed requirements listed under Article 5, but not, it appears to some local experts, the notarization requirement for the donation agreement, or the overseas organization's registration certificate (Notice Article 8).
Religious organizations accepting funds of 1 million renminbi (RMB, the Chinese currency) (approximately USD 162,800) or more must obtain permission from the State Administration for Religious Affairs (for national-level religious groups) and from the relevant provincial government (for local religious groups and sites) (Notice Article 8).
There was a great deal of concern among NPOs, especially informal NPOs that were unregistered or registered as businesses, that the Notice’s new regulations would make it difficult or even impossible to get funding from overseas organizations. Many informal NPOs, in particular, rely heavily on overseas funding. However, discussions with a number of informal NPOs in China suggest that while the Notice created more difficulties and red tape in securing and using overseas funds, it has generally not prevented NPOs from obtaining overseas funds transferred to their bank accounts. Implementation has been uneven, with some banks having stricter requirements than others. Some types of NPOs appear to have had more difficulty than others, as well: NPOs that get funding from sensitive overseas organizations or are engaged in “democracy promotion” or “labor rights” have reported difficulty and delays in receiving their funds from overseas.
- Shawn Shieh: Deputy Director, China Labour Bulletin, email@example.com 
- Professor Jin Jinping: firstname.lastname@example.org 
- Professor Mark Sidel: email@example.com 
 After more than 2,000 years with its own unique legal tradition, China began to embrace the civil law tradition of the western world early in the 20th century. During the Republic of China period (1912-1949), systematic legislation placed China firmly in the civil law family. Since the establishment of the People's Republic of China in 1949, the legal tradition in China has remained mainly civil law, though with significant characteristics of socialism. Thus there is no Civil Code in China at present, but only General Principles of Civil Law.
 The standard translation for “Social Associations” has, in the past, been “Social Organizations,” which is confusing because “Social Organizations” is also the term used for the broader concept of shehui zuzhi, which includes SAs, CNIs and foundations. This Note therefore uses “Social Associations,” instead, because they most closely resemble what are known as membership associations.
 A number of scholars estimate that informal NPOs outnumber legal NPOs. As of 2012, there were approximately 450,000 legally-registered NPOs, but estimates of the number of informal NPOs run from 1 million to 3 million, depending on which types of organizations are counted. For discussions of these estimates, seeAndrew Watson, “Civil Society in a Transitional State: The Rise of Associations in China,” in Jonathan Unger, ed., Associations and the Chinese State (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2008), and Guosheng Deng, “The Hidden Rules Governing China’s Unregistered NGOs: Management and Consequences,” The China Review, 10:1 (Spring, 2010).
 In 2007, "Some Opinions of the General Office of the State Council about Accelerating and Promoting the Reform and Development of Trade Associations and Chambers of Commerce" encouraged the separation of trade unions from the government.
 At a press conference, Minister of Civil Affairs Li Liguo outlined the steps that the Ministry of Civil Affairs (MoCA) is taking to increase the 'vitality' of the social organizations sector. The steps focus on streamlining the registration process and increasing the decentralization process. Li noted that this requires working on direct registration and decentralizing approval power. He said MoCA will be adopting six measures to enliven the role of social organizations: 1) To carry out the work on direct registration of four categories of social organizations (Li noted that the Third Plenum Decision gave a green light to this reform. In addition to revising the registration requirements for shetuan, MoCA also needs to take the step of revising the regulations for civil non-enterprise institutions and foundations); 2) To eliminate any unnecessary approvals for registration (MoCA has done away with approvals for preparatory work to register as a SA, and for establishing branches for SAs and foundations); 3) To set a deadline for trade associations and chambers of commerce to cut ties with their administrative agencies; 4) To strengthen MoCA's monitoring and management work, and coordinate with other departments and responsible departments in different sectors on monitoring and management; 5) To provide support and guidance to social organizations to strengthen their governance, and encourage them to be transparent, and increase their capacity so that they can undertake social services contracted by the government; 6) To improve the healthy and orderly development of social organizations, mainly so that they can compete to provide more of the public and social services previously offered by the government. Tax incentives for social organizations also need to be improved. (See "Ministry of Civil Affairs: Four types of social organizations can register directly, and unnecessary endorsements will be stopped ," China News Network 中国新闻网, December 05, 2013)
 The Charity Promotion Law (hereafter “Charity Law”) has been in the drafting and review stages since 2006 and was expected to be issued as early as 2009. Passage of the law has taken much longer than anticipated, however, given disagreements between different agencies on key issues such as the definition of charity, the relationship between the different agencies regulating charitable activities, and the registration of charitable organizations. In 2013, Minister of Civil Affairs Li Liguo revealed that the Charity Law had been placed on the NPC Standing Council’s agenda. More reports  emerged in 2014 and 2015 that the Charity Law was on the National People’s Congress (NPC) legislative timetable and that various drafts were being considered. The NPC Domestic Affairs Legal Committee (全国人民代表大会内务司法委员会）has taken the lead in drafting the Charity Law and there are reports  (likely overly optimistic) that the Law will be submitted to the NPC Standing Committee for approval sometime in 2015. If and when adopted, the Charity Law would supersede the 1999 Public Benefits Donation Law. (See also, “How to get the stalled Charity Law moving ”, People’s Daily, September 7, 2011.)
A draft Overseas NGO Management Law, meanwhile, was introduced in May 2015. See note 25, below, for more information.
 For further information on tax laws applicable to NPOs in China, see Leon Irish, Jin Dongsheng, and Karla Simon, China's Tax Rules For Not-For-Profit Organizations  (hereafter Tax Report). The paper also contains a lengthy discussion of the general legal rules applicable to all types of NPOs in China.
 The Regulations on the Administration of Foundations (2004) were adopted to replace the 1988 Regulations on Foundations (issued by the State Council on September 27, 1988). Under the 1988 Regulations, foundations were a special category of social organization. Consequently, the term "social organization" in other laws and regulations has usually been used to include foundations. But the 2004 Regulations no longer describe foundations as a special category of social organization. Foundations may be in somewhat of a legal limbo, in theory if not in practice, because they are not discussed in the General Principles of Civil Law.
 One may question whether a public institution qualifies as an NPO at all, given that the government provides a public institution's original assets and exerts greater control over it than over an ordinary NPO. Even so, a public institution is subject to certain taxes on the same basis as social associations and civil non-enterprise institutions, and the Public Welfare Donations Law treats donations to institutions the same as donations to public benefit social organizations. Whatever category public institutions may belong in, they are regularly the recipients of foreign grants, and so they are included in this Note.
 Leon Irish, Jin Dongping, and Karla Simon list some of the problems with China’s tax system for NPOs in Section 5 of their 2004 World Bank study, “China’s Tax Rules for Not-for-Profit Organizations.” These problems are still relevant today.
 Article 50 of the Trust Law also lists the extent of "public benefit purposes" in terms of public benefit trusts (or charitable trusts). It is nearly the same as Article 3 of the Public Welfare Donations Law.
 The Department of Politics and Law of the Office of Law of the State Council & the Bureau of Administration of Non-governmental Organizations of the Ministry of Civil Affairs (ed.), "Interpretation of the Regulations on the Registration and Administration of Social Organizations and the Interim Regulations on the Registration and Administration of Private Non-enterprise Units," Beijing: China Social Press, 1999, pp.58-59.
 Id. p.142.
 Article 6 and 7 of the Opinions on Several Issues Concerning Registration and Administration of Enterprises (June 29, 1999).
 See Tax Report, supra note 7.
 In practice, however, there is evidence of widespread discrimination in employment and education against members of particular ethnic groups, as well as other groups such as those with disabilities and certain diseases. Some Chinese NPOs, such as Yirenping, were founded specifically to combat discrimination against these groups.
The Constitution also provides in formal terms for other rights and freedoms, including the freedom of speech, the press, assembly, association, procession and demonstration; the right to petition the state; the right to receive compensation for violations of civil rights; the right and duty to work and to rest; the right to assistance from the state for the elderly, ill, or disabled; rights to pursue scientific, literary, and artistic creation; equal rights for women; the right to defense for accused persons; and the right for minority nationalities to use their national languages.
In recent years, Chinese public interest lawyers have sought to enforce and detail some of these rights and freedoms through legal action. In most of those cases, the courts have declined to hear such petitions or have rejected them, and a number of public interest lawyers have been arrested, detained, or discouraged from undertaking rights-based cases.
 One rare example of a legally-registered NPO that was founded by a foreigner and managed to register as the representative office of a foreign foundation is Half the Sky, which works on orphan care and has very close ties with the Ministry of Civil Affairs.
 Chambers of commerce are the only type of foreign NPO regulated by stand-alone regulations, namely the Provisional Measures on Management of Foreign Chambers of Commerce in China issued in 1989. As mentioned earlier, foreign foundations are allowed to gain legal status under a section of the 2004 Regulations on Administration of Foundations, but these Regulations primarily address the legal registration and administration of Chinese foundations.
 Methods for the Implementation of the Interim Methods of Customs Duties Exemption of Donated Goods for the Purposes of Poverty Relief or Charity.
 While the Regulations use the term “foreign foundation,” the Ministry of Civil Affairs has not been strict about distinguishing between foundations and other types of NPOs in previous registration cases.
 Shawn Shieh and Signe Knutson, “The Roles and Challenges of International NGOs in China’s Development”  (China Development Brief, 2012).
 In 2010, the Yunnan provincial government issued the first-ever stand-alone regulations for foreign NPOs to participate in the document filing system (备案，bei’an) with the provincial Civil Affairs and Foreign Affairs departments (Yunnan Province’s Provisional Regulations Standardizing the Activities of Overseas Non-Governmental Organizations). This experimental measure is seen as a step toward full registration, with the intent of better regulating the activities of foreign NPOs in the province. However, implementation has taken time; as of September 2012, the Yunnan Civil Affairs website listed only roughly 30 foreign NPOs that have participated in the document filing system.
 The draft Overseas NGO Law was issued for public comment in May 2015. The draft Law, which appeared around the same time as several other draft laws including the draft Counterterrorism Law and draft National Security Law, raised numerous concerns about potential new restrictions for overseas NGOs, including additional registration requirements. The draft Law requires, for instance, that all overseas NGOs register with Public Security, regardless of whether they have an office in China or are carrying out projects or activities from their overseas office. Furthermore, registration under the draft Law requires getting an official government-approved unit to be a sponsor and submitting details about the NGO’s workplan and sources of funding. In the past, the requirement for NGOs to find an official sponsor in order to register has proved too high a bar for the vast majority of overseas NGOs working in China; as a result many have resorted to registering as businesses or remaining unregistered. The draft Law would not only keep the requirement for overseas NGOs with an office to find an official sponsor, but require the same of overseas NGOs that do not have an office but carry out projects and activities in China. The draft Law was developed by the Public Security Ministry, which would also be the registration agency for overseas NGOs under the law.
During the public comment period, many Chinese and overseas NGOs submitted comments to the Chinese authorities that were largely critical of the draft Law and called for major revisions. As of September 2015, a revised draft has still not appeared, but is expected later in the year. An English translation of the current draft, along with other news and analysis, can be found on at China Development Brief  and ChinaLawTranslate .
 These institutions include organizations participating in the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference – that is, longtime, government-established, national mass organizations with strong links to the Party and government, such as the All-China Federation of Trade Unions, Communist Youth League, Chinese Women's Federation, and similar groups. The groups exempt from registration based on decisions of the State Council include a range of long-standing social organizations with close ties to the Party and government, such as the Chinese Journalists Association, Soong Ching Ling Foundation, China Law Society, Red Cross Society of China, and others. Also subject to the reduced requirements are 11 artists' associations under the China Federation of Literary and Arts Circles and their provincial and municipal affiliates.