Private foundations wishing to make a cross-border grant must ensure that:
The easiest way for a private foundation to satisfy both of these requirements is to choose a grantee that is recognized by the IRS as a public charity.
If a private foundation chooses to make a grant to a non-U.S. organization that is not recognized by the IRS as a public charity the foundation must follow one of the two options provided in the tax code:
Equivalency determination documents that the grantee organization is the equivalent of a U.S. public charity. To fulfill the requirements of equivalency determination, the private foundation must make a good faith determination on the basis of an affidavit from the potential grantee or an opinion of legal counsel (either the private foundation’s or the potential grantee’s) that the grantee is the equivalent to a U.S. public charity. The following documents should be obtained and translated into English:
Review and download sample forms and affidavits for equivalency determination.
Advantages: This method does not require grantee reports at the end of each accounting period, a separate account dedicated to charitable purposes, or detailed reporting on Form 990-PF.
Disadvantages: This method requires gathering numerous documents translated into English, preparing affidavits and compiling detailed financial reporting from previous years (required to show that the foreign organization is not the equivalent of a U.S. private foundation) to make a “good faith determination” that the non-U.S. grantee is the equivalent of a U.S. public charity
Private foundations may apply grants to their payout requirement if they take the following steps to ensure the grant funds are used for charitable purposes:
Advantages: Because equivalency determination can be a lengthy and sometimes difficult process, requiring the collection of a substantial amount of information up front, grantmakers often choose to exercise expenditure responsibility.
Disadvantages: Grants reports are required from the grantee until all the funds have been expended which may require monitoring the grant over a period of several years.
Review and download sample forms and affidavits for expenditure responsibility.
According to a letter from the IRS to the Council on Foundations, a private foundation wishing to make a grant to a foreign organization can choose between expenditure responsibility and equivalency determination, and there is no obligation to rule out equivalency before turning to expenditure responsibility.
Situation |
Required Action |
Grantee is a non-charitable enterprise that will use the grant for charitable purposes |
Expenditure responsibility is the only way to make this grant |
Grantee cannot supply the information required for an equivalency affidavit |
Grantor must use expenditure responsibility because it does not have enough information for an equivalency determination |
Grantor evaluates the affidavit and concludes that despite everyone’s best efforts, the grantee is not the equivalent of a public charity |
Expenditure responsibility is the only way to make the grant |
Circumstances that favor Equivalency |
Circumstances that favor Expenditure Responsibility |
Grantor expects long-term relationship |
Grantor plans a one-time grant |
Grantee can supply governing documents and no financial data is needed (i.e., grantee is a school, hospital or church) |
Grantee may have considerable difficulty in supplying historical financial data or obtaining a certified copy of its governing documents |
Grantor wants flexible reporting procedures |
Grantor wants strict reporting provisions |
Grantor wants to make a general support grant |
|
Grantee plans to re-grant funds received to accomplish its exempt purposes |
|